Happy Birthday, Daddy!

Interesting properties of the number 52,

52 is the 5th Bell number, the number of ways to partition a set of 5 objects,

52 is a vertically symmetrical number,

52 is a decagonal number,

52 is an untouchable number since it is never the sum of proper divisors of any number

Finally, there are 52 cards in a deck of playing cards, 52 American hostages were held in the Iran hostage crisis and 52 white keys on a piano!

Happy birthday, Daddy! https://www.desmos.com/calculator/c18ye4bdzb

Lyrics to “Happy Birthday Daddy!”:

Ah 1 and a 2 and a 1, 2, 3, 4

Daddy it’s your birthday

Today’s your special day

You gave me the gift of a loving father and I’m paying you back today

Daddy it’s your birthday, Happy birthday daddy, Daddy it’s your birthday, Happy birthday daddy

I wish you love and goodwill, I wish you peace and joy, I wish you better than your heart desires and a 49th birthday enjoyed!

Daddy it’s your birthday, Happy birthday daddy, Daddy it’s your birthday, Happy birthday daddy

Recurring

Today I’m going to show a variety of proofs that 9.9 Recuring is equal to 10 and not just approximately. One of the things I love the most about these proofs is it shows how incompetent we humans are with the term infinity.

For example, Hilbert’s hotel – a thought experiment about a hotel with infinite rooms; one could get their head around this fairly easily at first but are perplexed when somebody asks “could you fit an infinite amount of passengers inside such a hotel”.

Another example could be the concept of smaller infinities, to begin, think about the ordinary integer infinity (from one Ad Infinitum) and the decimal infinity (0.0000….,0.999… and the numbers in between)

However, decimals are between integers so you could have a larger infinity when counting both the integer infinity and the decimal infinity in between. Strange, isn’t it?

Now let’s move on to The proofs!

To begin let’s talk about one proof used rather frequently,

We start off with 10 and divide it by three – (try it for yourself on a calculator!) you get 3.333 recuring now if you times that by three you get 9.999 recuring. But if 3.33… is 1/3 of 10 then timesing it by 3 should give us 3/3 therefore 9.99… is equivalent to 10

Sadly though, this proof does feel somewhat unsatisfying since if you don’t believe 9.99… is equal to ten you wouldn’t believe 3.33 is 1/3 of ten

Not finished yet

Monty Hall Problem

Today I have chosen quite a common problem that uses both interesting and helpful reasoning called the Monty Hall Problem

it begins in a game show with three doors, 2 of those doors contain goats (to make it simpler, I will just call it “dud”) and one contains a sports car (for clarity, I will just call it “win”).

After announcing the rules, the host lets you pick one of the doors; therefore, you have a 1 in 3 chance of picking “win”

But now the host opens another door always containing a “dud” and gives you the option of switching to the remaining door or sticking with your original choice

Now it may seem like you have a 1 in 2 chance either way and in a way – your right but not in the way you would think, let’s look at this in a different way.

In the second stage, these are the three possible options

You chose the “win” and both other options are the “dud”

You chose the “dud” and one of the other options is a “dud” but the other is a “win”

You chose the “dud” and one of the other options is a “win” but the other is a “dud”

Out of these options, only in one do you choose “win” meaning both other options would be a “dud” and by switching you would lose, in both other options the host eliminates the “dud” and by switching you would win.

So going back to the 1 in 2 quiery, there are in fact two different options but the “win” being behind the unchosen door occurs more frequently (2/3)

Now a TWIST

What would happen if your drunk friend ran up to the doors in the second phase and randomly opened one of the two other doors (instead of the host), it turns out that he opens a door with a “dud” behind it and the host decides to carry on, should you switch?

It turns out, this completely ruins your advantage and ill explain why

For the sake of this point imagine 18 people do this separately and the arrangement stays the same every time of 1 and second are “duds” while 3 is a “win” (unknown to them), so 6 people chose the first door, 6 people choose the second and 6 people choose the third.

However, this time, half of the people who chose the first and second door will have their friend open the “dud” door (these are the only ones we will pay attention to) while all of the people on the third door will see a “dud” since those are the only other options

Altogether, 6 people will see a goat on the first 2 doors while all six people will see a goat

From that information we no longer can tell wich door is better to choose since you are one of those 12 people and you have a 1/2 chance of choosing either door!

Weird isnt it

I hope you’ve learnt something from this or at least been intrigued!

And with that I bid you farewell!